Some Differences between Traditional and Integral Education

Activities/Interactions Often Observed in Traditional Classrooms
How this is Different in an Integral Classroom
Comments
The teacher is a taskmaster Teachers are guides, helpers, and co-learners In the Integral classroom the content and mode of learning is decided together with the children; individual choices are welcomed and respected
Product based ­ goals are test scores and degrees Process based - integral development of the child includes: discovery of life-purpose, exploration of inner nature, joy of learning for its own sake By becoming aware of their unique capacities, not only will students be academic achievers, they will further become aware of their life purpose
Classrooms have up to 36 children with one teacher Ratio is 12 students to one or more teachers Small class size and individual attention allow for the "minimum syllabus" (or the standard academic achievement expected in most academic institutions of a certain age group) to be easily and comfortably met during the year and then the child goes on to create an individual syllabus for themselves, based on their own interests and personal development
The teacher asks questions with yes/no or one or two word answers Teachers ask open ended questions Open questions help to create self awareness in children and help them to reflect on their outlook in life
Children are compared with each other, often seen in grading Teachers help the child to gain confidence in his own capacities Comparison with other children erodes confidence; when a child is helped to observe him/herself they learn to make conscious choices
The teacher see mistakes as a waste of time Learning can take place through trial and error, risk taking is encouraged Making mistakes is a natural by-product of learning and allows the child to understand there is always more room for improvement
Children are told what to do Learning is seen as self discovery and self development In the Integral classroom, students are given time for space and reflection
The teacher teaches the same lesson to every one in the class Teachers provide opportunity for the child to make real and conscious choices and is allowed a variety in content of learning By offering choices, the students’ become aware of their own likes and dislikes; their own capacities and difficulties and helps them find their own way to maximum self-development
The child is given consequences by the teacher Teachers help the child to see that their choices have consequences The responsibility for learning shifts more and more to the child as the child grows
The teacher scold, excessively praise, or judge children through tests and examinations Teachers help the child to strive for perfections through their own inner qualities Children learn to look within themselves, become self-aware, courageous, and intrinsically motivated with a genuine love of learning
The teacher uses the same standards to decide how to teach the class Teachers are tasked with having a deep understanding of each individual student in the class and guides them according to their own capabilities and uniqueness Children are honored for their own development and unique qualities and the curriculum is fitted to their personal needs and interests
Children learn through rote memorization and lecture in the classroom Children are provided with hands on experience so that they can relate things to themselves and connect them to their own lives When children learn experientially, it gives them an innate understanding, and they can grasp, connect to, incorporate, and expand this information to help them learn further